<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org">
<title>PTJ Online Now! Articles</title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org</link>
<description>Physical Therapy - RSS feed of Online Now! Articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1538-6724</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Physical Therapy</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0031-9023</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080002v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070374v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070171v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070269v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070179v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070296v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070308v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070233v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070184v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Physical Therapy</title>
<url>http://www.ptjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080002v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Description of the Trials, Reviews, and Practice Guidelines Indexed in the PEDro Database]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080002v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This perspective provides an overview of the randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in physical therapy. Data from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) are used to describe key events in the history of physical therapy research and the growth of evidence of effects of interventions used in the various subdisciplines of physical therapy. The 11,494 records that were identified reveal a rich history of physical therapy research dating back to the first trial in 1929. Most of the randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in physical therapy have been published since the year 2000. This rapid growth presents a challenge for physical therapists who want to keep up to date in clinical practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maher, C. G, Moseley, A. M, Sherrington, C., Elkins, M. R, Herbert, R. D]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20080002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Description of the Trials, Reviews, and Practice Guidelines Indexed in the PEDro Database]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070374v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[After Partial Knee Replacement, Patients Can Kneel, But They Need to Be Taught to Do So: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070374v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>Kneeling is an important functional activity frequently not performed after knee replacement, thus affecting a patient's ability to carry out basic daily tasks. Despite no clinical reason preventing kneeling, many patients fail to resume this activity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a single physical therapy intervention would improve patient-reported kneeling ability following partial knee replacement (PKR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Subjects</b></st>
<p>Sixty adults with medial compartment osteoarthritis, suitable for a PKR, participated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>This was a single-blind, prospective randomized controlled trial. Six weeks after PKR, participants randomly received either kneeling advice and education or routine care where no specific kneeling advice was given. Reassessment was at 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported kneeling ability, as assessed by question 7 of the Oxford Knee Score. Other factors associated with kneeling ability were recorded. These factors were scar position, numbness, range of flexion, involvement of other joints, and pain. Statistical analysis included nonparametric tests and binary logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>A significant improvement in patient-reported kneeling ability was found at 1 year postoperatively in those participants who received the kneeling intervention. Group allocation was the only factor determining an improvement in patient-reported kneeling ability at 1 year postoperatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion and Conclusion</b></st>
<p>The single factor that predicted patient-reported kneeling ability at 1 year postoperatively was the physical therapy kneeling intervention given at 6 weeks after PKR. The results of this study suggest that advice and instruction in kneeling should form part of a postoperative rehabilitation program after PKR. The results can be applied only to patients following PKR.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenkins, C., Barker, K. L, Pandit, H., Dodd, C. A., Murray, D. W]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070374</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[After Partial Knee Replacement, Patients Can Kneel, But They Need to Be Taught to Do So: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070171v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time Series Analysis of Spontaneous Upper-Extremity Movements of Premature Infants With Brain Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070171v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>Comparisons of spontaneous movements of premature infants with brain injuries and those without brain injuries can provide insights into normal and abnormal processes in the ontogeny of motor development. In this study, the characteristics of spontaneous upper-extremity movements of premature infants with brain injuries and those without brain injuries were examined with time series analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Subjects</b></st>
<p>Participants were 7 premature infants with brain injuries and 7 matched, low-risk, premature infants at the age of 1 month after term.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>A triaxial accelerometer was used to measure upper-extremity limb acceleration in 3-dimensional space. Acceleration signals were recorded from the right wrist when the infant was in an active, alert state and lying in the supine position. The recording time was 200 seconds. The acceleration signal was sampled at a rate of 200 Hz. The acceleration time series data were analyzed by nonlinear analysis as well as linear analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>The nonlinear time series analysis indicated that spontaneous movements of premature infants have nonlinear, chaotic, dynamic characteristics. The movements of the infants with brain injuries were characterized by larger dimensionality, and they were more unstable and unpredictable than those of infants without brain injuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion and Conclusion</b></st>
<p>As determined by nonlinear analysis, the spontaneous movements of the premature infants with brain injuries had the characteristics of increased disorganization compared with those of the infants without brain injuries. Infants with brain injuries may manifest problems with self-organization as a function of the coordination of subsystems. Physical therapists should be able to support interactions among the subsystems and promote self-organization of motor learning through the individualized provision of various sensorimotor experiences for infants.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohgi, S., Morita, S., Loo, K. K., Mizuike, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070171</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Time Series Analysis of Spontaneous Upper-Extremity Movements of Premature Infants With Brain Injuries]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070269v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Puckering and Blowing Facial Expressions in People With Facial Movement Disorders]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070269v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>People with facial movement disorders are instructed to perform various facial movements as part of their physical therapy rehabilitation. A difference in the movement of the orbicularis oris muscle has been demonstrated among people without facial nerve impairments when instructed to "pucker your lips" and to "blow, as if blowing out a candle." The objective of this study was to determine whether the within-subject difference between "pucker your lips" and "blow, as if blowing out a candle" found in people without facial nerve impairments is present in people with facial movement disorders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Subjects and Methods</b></st>
<p>People (N=68) with unilateral facial movement disorders were observed as they produced puckering and blowing movements. Automated facial image analysis of both puckering and blowing was used to determine the difference between facial actions for the following movement variables: maximum speed, amplitude, duration, and corresponding asymmetry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>There was a difference between the amplitudes of movement for puckering and blowing. "Blow, as if blowing out a candle" produced a larger amplitude of movement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion and Conclusion</b></st>
<p>The findings demonstrate that puckering and blowing movements in people with facial movement disorders differ in a manner that is consistent with differences found in people who are healthy. This information may be useful in the assessment of and intervention for facial movement disorders affecting the lower face.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denlinger, R. L, VanSwearingen, J. M, Cohn, J. F, Schmidt, K. L]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070269</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Puckering and Blowing Facial Expressions in People With Facial Movement Disorders]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070179v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scale for Contraversive Pushing: Cutoff Scores for Diagnosing "Pusher Behavior" and Construct Validity]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070179v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>Considerable disagreement exists among researchers with regard to the prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment of "pusher behavior" (PB), partly because of different testing procedures. This study was primarily aimed at establishing cutoff scores for and the construct validity of the Scale for Contraversive Pushing (SCP). The prevalence of PB in people with right- and left-brain lesions also was investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Subjects and Methods</b></st>
<p>The study subjects were 105 consecutive patients with recent stroke. Two methods were used to diagnose PB: clinical examination and SCP score with 3 different cutoff points&mdash;an SCP total score of greater than 0 (Crit_1), subscores in each section of the scale of greater than 0 (Crit_2), and subscores in each section of the scale of &ge;1 (Crit_3). Clinical and SCP diagnoses were independently made by different examiners. The Cohen  coefficient was used to determine the agreement between clinical and SCP diagnoses. The construct validity of the SCP was estimated by calculation of Spearman rank correlation coefficients for SCP and balance, mobility, and functional scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>The agreement between clinical and SCP diagnoses was low (=.212) when Crit_1 was used. Crit_2 led to the highest agreement with the clinical diagnosis (=.933). However, only Crit_3, although globally less accurate (=.754), ensured no false-positive results. The construct validity of the SCP was demonstrated by significant (<I>P</I>&lt;.001) moderate to high correlations with mobility (rho=.595), functional (rho=.632), and balance (rho=.666) scores. The prevalence of PB was not influenced by the side of the lesion. A limitation of the study was that the reliability of the clinical examination method was not investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion and Conclusion</b></st>
<p>The results support the validity of the SCP and suggest the need to choose different SCP cutoff criteria (Crit_2 or Crit_3) according to the aim of the evaluation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baccini, M., Paci, M., Nannetti, L., Biricolti, C., Rinaldi, L. A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070179</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scale for Contraversive Pushing: Cutoff Scores for Diagnosing "Pusher Behavior" and Construct Validity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070296v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in Functional Walking Distance and Health-Related Quality of Life After Gastric Bypass Surgery]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070296v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>Early physical functional changes after gastric bypass surgery (GBS) are unclear, and the relationship between these changes and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) has not been reported. We measured distances from a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and scores on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) before and after GBS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Subjects and Methods</b></st>
<p>Twenty-five people undergoing GBS completed the SF-36 and 6MWT presurgically and at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up visits. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during 6MWTs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Presurgical walking distance (<ovl>X</ovl>&plusmn;SD; 414.1&plusmn;103.7 m) was 55%&plusmn;14% of normative values. Distances increased significantly at 3 months (505.2&plusmn;98.0 m) and at 6 months (551.5&plusmn;101.2 m). Final RPEs decreased significantly, and HR-QOL improved significantly. Both physical and mental health components of the SF-36 improved significantly. Distance was inversely correlated with body mass throughout the study and positively correlated with the SF-36 Physical Component Summary change from 3 to 6 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion and Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Improved functional capacity was associated with enhanced HR-QOL. At 6 months, walking distances remained 75% of those for age-matched peers who had normal weight.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tompkins, J., Bosch, P. R, Chenowith, R., Tiede, J. L, Swain, J. M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070296</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in Functional Walking Distance and Health-Related Quality of Life After Gastric Bypass Surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070308v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Direct Access to Physical Therapy in the Netherlands: Results From the First Year in Community-Based Physical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070308v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>In 2006, direct access to physical therapy was introduced in the Netherlands. Before this policy measure, evaluation and treatment by a physical therapist were only possible following referral by a physician.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The objectives of this study were to investigate how many patients use direct access and to establish whether these patients have a different profile than referred patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Electronic health care data from the National Information Service for Allied Health Care (LiPZ), a nationally representative registration network of 93 Dutch physical therapists working in 43 private practices, were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>In 2006, 28% of the patients seen by a physical therapist came by direct access. Patients with non&ndash;further-specified back problems, patients with nonspecific neck complaints, and higher-educated patients were more likely to refer themselves to a physical therapist, as were patients with health problems lasting for less than 1 month. Younger patients made more use of direct access. In addition, patients with recurring complaints more often referred themselves, as did patients who had received earlier treatment by a physical therapist. Patients with direct access received fewer treatment sessions. Compared with 2005, there was no increase in the number of patients visiting a physical therapist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Data came only from physical therapists working on general conditions in general practices. Severity of complaints is not reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>A large, specific group of patients utilized self-referral, but the total number of patients seen by a physical therapist remained the same. In the future, it is important to evaluate the consequences of direct access, both on quality aspects and on cost-effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leemrijse, C. J, Swinkels, I. C., Veenhof, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070308</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Direct Access to Physical Therapy in the Netherlands: Results From the First Year in Community-Based Physical Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070233v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Process for Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Model to a Patient With Patellar Dislocation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070233v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>The <I>International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health</I> (ICF) has been proposed as a possible framework for organizing physical therapist practice. The purpose of this case report is to describe an evaluative and diagnostic process that is based on the ICF framework for a patient with a patellar dislocation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Case Description</b></st>
<p>The patient was a 23-year-old woman who sustained a right knee and patellofemoral joint injury, resulting in a sprain of the medial collateral ligament and a suspected sprain of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Evaluation at 4 weeks demonstrated a primary impairment of patellar instability associated with the primary activity limitation of limited walking distances. A plan of care to address impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions was developed, with modifications made on the basis of the patient's health condition and personal and environmental factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Outcomes</b></st>
<p>The patient attained all of her goals for therapy and was able to return to her normal activities and recreational pursuits without a recurrence of a patellar dislocation. Lower-Extremity Function Scale scores increased from 30 out of 80 to 76 out of 80 during the course of treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion</b></st>
<p>The ICF model has been proposed as a framework for developing diagnostic classifications for rehabilitation professionals. The ICF model also should be assessed with regard to whether it provides a useful process for clinical decision making. The ICF model directs practitioners to address patients' problems at the level of the whole person, with modifications made on the basis of health conditions and personal and environmental factors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helgeson, K., Smith, A R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070233</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Process for Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Model to a Patient With Patellar Dislocation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070184v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Tumor-Related Hemipelvectomy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20070184v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>Hemipelvectomy is a life-changing treatment for pelvic malignancies. This study compared functional outcomes and quality of life of patients following internal or external hemipelvectomies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Subjects</b></st>
<p>Ninety-seven patients who underwent tumor-related internal (n=39) or external (n=58) hemipelvectomy surgery between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 2004, participated in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Using a descriptive retrospective cohort study design, functional status was evaluated with the Barthel Index at 3 time points. Quality-of-life parameters were evaluated at follow-up using the Linear Analog Self-Assessment tool (LASA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Data were collected on all 97 patients at rehabilitation consultation and hospital discharge. Follow-up data were obtained via survey on 44% of the original group at a median of 5.8 years (interquartile range [IRQ]=1.7&ndash;10.4) after surgery. Median total Barthel Index scores were similar between the internal and external hemipelvectomy groups at the initial physical medicine and rehabilitation assessment (10 [IQR=10&ndash;15] versus 10 [IQR=3.75&ndash;15]), at discharge (40 [IQR=30&ndash;65] versus 50 [IQR=35&ndash;66.25]), and at follow-up (92.5 [IQR=76.25&ndash;100] versus 92.5 [IQR=78.75&ndash;96.25]). Participants with external hemipelvectomies were less independent in bladder function and experienced greater pain severity at follow-up compared with those with internal hemipelvectomies. Overall quality-of-life parameters were similar between the groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion and Conclusion</b></st>
<p>Despite significant differences in surgical procedures, immediate and long-term functional outcomes and quality-of-life parameters were similar among participants with internal and external hemipelvectomies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beck, L. A, Einertson, M. J, Winemiller, M. H, DePompolo, R. W, Hoppe, K. M, Sim, F. F]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070184</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Tumor-Related Hemipelvectomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Report</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>