<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org">
<title>Physical Therapy recent issues</title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org</link>
<description>Physical Therapy RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1538-6724</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Physical Therapy</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0031-9023</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/812?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/820?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/832?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/841?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/854?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/857?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/873?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/887-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/893?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/699?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/703?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/712?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/720?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/747?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/757?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/766?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/780?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/791?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/793?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/794?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/796?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/801?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/555?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/592?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/594?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/608?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/620?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/629?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/640?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/652?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/664?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/679?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/679-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/680?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/684?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/688?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/688-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/689?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/437?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/449?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/460?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/462?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/471?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/494?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/523?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/536?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/536-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/538?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/539?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/539-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/543?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ptjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Physical Therapy</title>
<url>http://www.ptjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/812?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of an Inpatient Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for People With Parkinson Disease]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/812?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> In the outpatient setting, it can be difficult to effectively manage the complex medical and rehabilitation needs of people with Parkinson disease (PD). A multidisciplinary approach in the inpatient rehabilitation environment may be a viable alternative. The purposes of this study were: (1) to investigate the effectiveness of an inpatient rehabilitation program for people with a primary diagnosis of PD, (2) to determine whether gains made were clinically meaningful, and (3) to identify predictors of rehabilitation outcome.</P>
<P><B>Subjects:</B> Sixty-eight subjects with a diagnosis of PD were admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital with a multidisciplinary movement disorders program.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> Subjects participated in a rehabilitation program consisting of a combination of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy for a total of 3 hours per day, 5 to 7 days per week, in addition to pharmacological adjustments based on data collected daily. A pretest-posttest design was implemented. The differences between admission and discharge scores on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) (total, motor, and cognitive scores), Timed "Up &amp; Go" Test, 2-Minute Walk Test, and Finger Tapping Test were analyzed.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> An analysis of data obtained for the 68 subjects admitted with a diagnosis of PD revealed significant improvements across all outcome measures from admission to discharge. Subjects with PD whose medications were not adjusted during their admission (rehabilitation only) (n=10) showed significant improvements in FIM total, motor, and cognitive scores. Improvements exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in 71% of the subjects. Prior level of function at admission accounted for 20% of the variance in the FIM total change score.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The results suggest that subjects with a diagnosis of PD as a primary condition benefited from an inpatient rehabilitation program designed to improve functional status.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellis, T., Katz, D. I, White, D. K, DePiero, T J., Hohler, A. D, Saint-Hilaire, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070265</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of an Inpatient Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for People With Parkinson Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>819</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>812</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/820?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical Therapy Intervention for People With Huntington Disease]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/820?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The clinical symptoms of Huntington disease (HD) include progressive movement disorders, cognitive deficits, and behavioral changes, all of which affect an individual's ability to participate in activities of daily living. To date, very few quantitative or qualitative studies have been conducted to guide physical therapists working with people with HD. The objective of this study was to characterize current physical therapist practice for people with HD, thus informing the development of standardized clinical care and future research studies.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> Consultation with physical therapists working with people with HD was undertaken in the form of mailed questionnaires (n=49) and semistructured interviews (n=8). The development of the interview schedule was aided by consideration of the data obtained from the questionnaires. Themes identified from the interviews were considered in light of published literature and questionnaire responses.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The main issues that emerged from the interviews were classified into 3 subthemes: (1) there is insufficient use of routine physical therapy&ndash;related outcome measures at different stages of HD, (2) there is underutilization of physical therapy services in managing HD (particularly in the early stages), and (3) the management of falls and mobility deficit progression is a key treatment aim for people with HD.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> A conceptual framework for physical therapy intervention in HD was developed on the basis of the themes that emerged from the data in this study. Such a framework has utility for complex, progressive conditions such as HD and may facilitate clinical decision making and standardization of practice and affect the development of future physical therapy trials.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Busse, M. E, Khalil, H., Quinn, L., Rosser, A. E]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070346</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical Therapy Intervention for People With Huntington Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>831</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>820</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/832?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breathing: A Sign of Life and a Unique Area for Reflection and Action]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/832?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The aim of this study was to clarify patients&rsquo; experiences of breathing during therapeutic processes in Norwegian psychomotor physical therapy (NPMP).</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> A qualitative approach was used based on interviews with 9 women and 1 man aged between 41 and 65 years. The data were analyzed with the aid of grounded theory.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Three categories were identified from the participants&rsquo; experiences: (1) "Breathing: An Incomprehensible and Disparate Phenomenon," (2) "Breathing: Access to Meaning and Understanding," and (3) "Breathing: Enhancing Feelings of Mastery." Initially, breathing difficulties and bodily pains were described as physical reactions that seemed utterly incomprehensible to the participants. Communication, both verbal and nonverbal, between the patient and the physical therapist was described as vitally important, as was conscious attention to occurrences during the treatment sessions. The participants learned to recognize changes in their breathing patterns, and they became familiar with new bodily sensations. Consequently, they acquired new understanding of these sensations. The feeling and understanding of being an entity (ie, "body and soul") emerged during therapy. The participants increased their understanding of the interaction between breathing and internal and external influences on their well-being. Their feelings of mastery over their daily lives were enhanced. The therapeutic dialogues gave them the chance to explore, reflect, and become empowered.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> In experiencing their own breathing, the participants were able to access and identify the muscular and emotional patterns that, linked to particular thoughts and beliefs, had become their characteristic styles of relating to themselves and the world.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ekerholt, K., Bergland, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070316</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breathing: A Sign of Life and a Unique Area for Reflection and Action]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>840</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>832</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/841?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interrater Reliability of the Extended ICF Core Set for Stroke Applied by Physical Therapists]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/841?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The World Health Organization's <I>International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health</I> (ICF) is gaining recognition in physical therapy. The Extended ICF Core Set for Stroke is a practical tool that represents a selection of categories from the whole classification and can be used along with the ICF qualifier scale to describe patients&rsquo; functioning and disability following stroke. The application of the ICF qualifier scale poses the question of interrater reliability. The primary objective of this investigation was to study the agreement between physical therapists&rsquo; ratings of subjects&rsquo; functioning and disability with the Extended ICF Core Set for Stroke and with the ICF qualifier scale. Further objectives were to explore the relationships between agreement and rater confidence and between agreement and physical therapists&rsquo; areas of core competence.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> A monocentric, cross-sectional reliability study was conducted. A consecutive sample of 30 subjects after stroke participated. Two physical therapists rated the subjects&rsquo; functioning in 166 ICF categories.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The interrater agreement of the 2 physical therapists was moderate across all judgments (observed agreement=51%, kappa=.41). Interrater reliability was not related to rater confidence or to the physical therapists&rsquo; areas of core competence.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The present study suggests potential improvements to enhance the implementation of the ICF and the Extended ICF Core Set for Stroke in practice. The results hint at the importance of the operationalization of the ICF categories and the standardization of the rating process, which might be useful in controlling for rater effects and increasing reliability.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starrost, K., Geyh, S., Trautwein, A., Grunow, J., Ceballos-Baumann, A., Prosiegel, M., Stucki, G., Cieza, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070211</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interrater Reliability of the Extended ICF Core Set for Stroke Applied by Physical Therapists]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>851</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>841</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jette, A. M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070211.ic</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>853</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/854?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/854?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geyh, S., Stucki, G., Cieza, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070211.ar</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>856</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>854</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/857?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ottawa Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Aerobic Fitness Exercises in the Management of Fibromyalgia: Part 1]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/857?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The objective of this study was to create guidelines for the use of aerobic fitness exercises in the management of adult patients (&gt;18 years of age) with fibromyalgia, as defined by the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> Following Cochrane Collaboration methods, the Ottawa Methods Group found and synthesized evidence from comparative controlled trials and formed the Ottawa Panel, with nominated experts from key stakeholder organizations. The Ottawa Panel then developed criteria for grading the recommendations based on experimental design (I for randomized controlled trials, II for nonrandomized studies) and strength of evidence (A, B, C+, C, D+, D, or D&ndash;). From the rigorous literature search, 13 randomized control trials and 3 controlled clinical trials were selected. Statistical analysis was based on Cochrane Collaboration methods. Continuous data were calculated with weighted mean differences between the intervention and control groups, and dichotomous data were analyzed with relative risks. Clinical improvement was calculated using absolute benefit and relative difference in change from baseline. Clinical significance was attained when an improvement of 15% relative to a control was found.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> There were 24 positive recommendations: 10 grade A, 1 grade B, and 13 grade C+. Of these 24 positive recommendations, only 5 were of clinical benefit.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The Ottawa Panel recommends aerobic fitness exercises for the management of fibromyalgia as a result of the emerging evidence (grades A, B, and C+, although most trials were rated low quality) shown in the literature.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brosseau, L., Wells, G. A, Tugwell, P., Egan, M., Wilson, K. G, Dubouloz, C.-J., Casimiro, L., Robinson, V. A, McGowan, J., Busch, A., Poitras, S., Moldofsky, H., Harth, M., Finestone, H. M, Nielson, W., Haines-Wangda, A., Russell-Doreleyers, M., Lambert, K., Marshall, A. D, Veilleux, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ottawa Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Aerobic Fitness Exercises in the Management of Fibromyalgia: Part 1]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>871</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>857</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/873?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ottawa Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Strengthening Exercises in the Management of Fibromyalgia: Part 2]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/873?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The objective of this study was to create guidelines for the use of strengthening exercises in the management of adult patients (&gt;18 years of age) with fibromyalgia (FM), as defined by the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> Following Cochrane Collaboration methods, the Ottawa Methods Group found and synthesized evidence from comparative controlled trials and formed the Ottawa Panel, with nominated experts from key stakeholder organizations. The Ottawa Panel then developed criteria for grading the recommendations based on experimental design (I for randomized controlled trials, II for nonrandomized studies) and strength of evidence (A, B, C+, C, D+, D, or D&ndash;). From the rigorous literature search, 5 randomized controlled trials were selected. Statistical analysis was based on Cochrane Collaboration methods. Continuous data were calculated with weighted mean differences between the intervention and control groups, and dichotomous data were analyzed with relative risks. Clinical improvement was calculated using absolute benefit and relative difference in change from baseline. Clinical significance was attained when an improvement of 15% relative to a control was found.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> There were 5 positive recommendations: 2 grade A and 3 grade C+. All 5 were of clinical benefit.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The Ottawa Panel recommends strengthening exercises for the management of fibromyalgia as a result of the emerging evidence (grades A, B, and C+, although most trials were rated low quality) shown in the literature.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brosseau, L., Wells, G. A, Tugwell, P., Egan, M., Wilson, K. G, Dubouloz, C.-J., Casimiro, L., Robinson, V. A, McGowan, J., Busch, A., Poitras, S., Moldofsky, H., Harth, M., Finestone, H. M, Nielson, W., Haines-Wangda, A., Russell-Doreleyers, M., Lambert, K., Marshall, A. D, Veilleux, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ottawa Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Strengthening Exercises in the Management of Fibromyalgia: Part 2]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>886</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>873</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Work-related musculoskeletal disorders..." Campo MA, et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:608-609.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halloran, S. W]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.7.887.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Work-related musculoskeletal disorders..." Campo MA, et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:608-609.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>887</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/887-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/887-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campo, M. A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.7.887.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>888</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance..." Steffen T, Seney M. Phys Ther. 2008;88:733-746.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stratford, P. W]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.7.888</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance..." Steffen T, Seney M. Phys Ther. 2008;88:733-746.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>890</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steffen, T. M, Seney, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.7.890</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>891</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[APTA Ethics and Judicial Committee Disciplinary Action]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[APTA Ethics and Judicial Committee Disciplinary Action]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>893</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Association Business</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/895?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/7/895?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.7.895</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>896</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>895</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Scholarships, Fellowships, and Grants</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/699?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New Author Service: PTJ Makes PubMed Central Deposits]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/699?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.6.699</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New Author Service: PTJ Makes PubMed Central Deposits]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>700</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>699</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/703?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Muscle Activation During Selected Strength Exercises in Women With Chronic Neck Muscle Pain]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/703?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Muscle-specific strength training has previously been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation of chronic neck muscle pain in women. The aim of this study was to determine the level of activation of the neck and shoulder muscles using surface electromyography (EMG) during selected strengthening exercises in women undergoing rehabilitation for chronic neck muscle pain (defined as a clinical diagnosis of trapezius myalgia).</P>
<P><B>Subjects:</B> The subjects were 12 female workers (age=30&ndash;60 years) with a clinical diagnosis of trapezius myalgia and a mean baseline pain intensity of 5.6 (range=3&ndash;8) on a scale of 0 to 9.</P>
<P><B>Method:</B> Electromyographic activity in the trapezius and deltoid muscles was measured during the exercises (lateral raises, upright rows, shrugs, one-arm rows, and reverse flys) and normalized to EMG activity recorded during a maximal voluntary static contraction (MVC).</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> For most exercises, the level of muscle activation was relatively high (&gt;60% of MVC), highlighting the effectiveness and specificity of the respective exercises. For the trapezius muscle, the highest level of muscle activation was found during the shrug (102&plusmn;11% of MVC), lateral raise (97&plusmn;6% of MVC), and upright row (85&plusmn;5% of MVC) exercises, but the latter 2 exercises required smaller training loads (3&ndash;10 kg) compared with the shrug exercise (20&ndash;30 kg).</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The lateral raise and upright row may be suitable alternatives to shrugs during rehabilitation of chronic neck muscle pain. Several of the strength exercises had high activation of neck and shoulder muscles in women with chronic neck pain. These exercises can be used equally in the attempt to achieve a beneficial treatment effect on chronic neck muscle pain.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersen, L. L, Kjaer, M., Andersen, C. H, Hansen, P. B, Zebis, M. K, Hansen, K., Sjogaard, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Muscle Activation During Selected Strength Exercises in Women With Chronic Neck Muscle Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>711</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>703</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/712?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical Functioning Before and After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Perception and Performance]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/712?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Self-report and performance-based measures of physical functioning in people before and after total hip arthroplasty seem to present different information. The relationship between these different measures is not well understood, and little information is available about changes in this relationship over time. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the relationship between self-report and performance-based measures of physical functioning before and after total hip arthroplasty, (2) to assess the influence of pain on the relationship, and (3) to determine whether the relationship changes over time.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> Seventy-five subjects admitted for total hip arthroplasty were included and examined before and 6 and 26 weeks after surgery. The relationships between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical functioning subscale and walking speed and gait variability were examined by use of generalized estimating equations, which included interactions with time and the WOMAC pain subscale.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The relationship between self-report and performance-based measures of physical functioning was poor. Pain appeared to have a considerable influence on self-reported physical functioning. The relationship did not appear to change over time.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The influence of pain on self-reported physical functioning serves as an explanation for the poor relationship between self-reported and performance-based physical functioning. When using a self-report measure such as the WOMAC, one should realize that it does not seem to assess the separate constructs&mdash;physical functioning and pain&mdash;that are claimed to be measured.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Akker-Scheek, I., Zijlstra, W., Groothoff, J. W, Bulstra, S. K, Stevens, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20060301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical Functioning Before and After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Perception and Performance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>719</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>712</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/720?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motor Learning in Children: Feedback Effects on Skill Acquisition]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/720?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Reduced feedback during motor skill practice benefits motor learning. However, it is unknown whether these findings can be applied to motor learning in children, given that children have different information-processing capabilities than adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different relative frequencies of feedback on skill acquisition in children compared with young adults.</P>
<P><B>Subjects:</B> The participants were 20 young adults and 20 children.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> All participants practiced 200 trials of a discrete arm movement with specific spatiotemporal parameters. Participants from each group (adults and children) were randomly assigned to either a 100% feedback group or a reduced (62% faded) feedback group. Learning was inferred from the performance on the delayed (24-hour) retention and reacquisition tests.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> All participants improved accuracy and consistency across practice trials. During practice, the adults performed with significantly less error than the children. Adults who practiced with reduced feedback performed with increased consistency during the retention test compared with those who practiced with 100% feedback. In contrast, children who received reduced feedback during practice performed with less accuracy and consistency during the retention test than those who received 100% feedback. However, when feedback was reintroduced during the reacquisition test, the children in the reduced feedback group were able to improve their performance comparable to those in the 100% feedback group.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusions:</B> During motor learning, children use feedback in a manner different from that of adults. To optimize motor learning, children may require longer periods of practice, with feedback reduced more gradually, compared with young adults.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sullivan, K. J, Kantak, S. S, Burtner, P. A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motor Learning in Children: Feedback Effects on Skill Acquisition]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>732</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>720</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/733?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change on Balance and Ambulation Tests, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale in People With Parkinsonism]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/733?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Distinguishing between a clinically significant change and change due to measurement error can be difficult. The purpose of this study was to determine test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change for the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), forward and backward functional reach, the Romberg Test and the Sharpened Romberg Test (SRT) with eyes open and closed, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), comfortable and fast gait speed, the Timed "Up &amp; Go" Test (TUG), the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in people with parkinsonism.</P>
<P><B>Subjects:</B> Thirty-seven community-dwelling adults with parkinsonism (mean age=71 years) participated. The Hoehn and Yahr Scale median score of 2 was on the lower end of the scale; however, the scores ranged from 1 to 4.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> Subjects were tested twice by the same raters, with 1 week between tests. Test-retest reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Minimal detectable change was calculated using a 95% confidence interval (MDC<SUB>95</SUB>).</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The ICCs for test-retest reliability were above .90 for the BBS, ABC Scale, SRT with eyes closed, 6MWT, and comfortable and fast gait speeds. The MDC<SUB>95</SUB> values for those functional tests were: BBS=5/56, ABC Scale=13%, SRT with eyes closed=19 seconds, 6MWT=82 m, comfortable gait speed=0.18 m/s, and fast gait speed=0.25 m/s. The ICCs for test-retest reliability of SF-36 scores were above .80, with the exception of the social functioning subscale. The MDC<SUB>95</SUB> values for the SF-36 ranged between 19% and 45%. The MDC<SUB>95</SUB> values for the UPDRS Activities of Daily Living section, Motor Examination section, and total scores were 4/52, 11/108, and 13/176, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Minimal detectable change values are useful to therapists in rehabilitation and wellness programs in determining whether change during or after intervention is clinically significant. High test-retest reliability of scores for the BBS, ABC Scale, SRT with eyes closed, 6MWT, and gait speed make them trustworthy functional assessments in people with parkinsonism. The SF-36 and UPDRS provide quality-of-life and disease severity rating values in the ongoing assessment of people with parkinsonism.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steffen, T., Seney, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070214</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change on Balance and Ambulation Tests, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale in People With Parkinsonism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>746</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>733</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/747?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validity of Values for Metabolic Equivalents of Task During Submaximal All-Extremity Exercise and Reliability of Exercise Responses in Frail Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/747?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Physical therapists and rehabilitation professionals in hospital and long-term care centers are using all-extremity semirecumbent exercise machines in their treatment programs. This study was undertaken to investigate the concurrent validity of values for software-generated metabolic equivalents of task (MET) from an all-extremity semirecumbent exercise machine and directly measured values for MET from a portable metabolic unit across a range of submaximal exercise intensities. A second purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of oxygen consumption and heart rate responses in older adults between standardized sessions of submaximal all-extremity aerobic exercise.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> The study participants were 18 older adults (mean age=82 years, SD=5; 3 women, 15 men) who were living in long-term care centers and who completed 2 test sessions of a standardized exercise protocol 1 week apart. The exercise protocol included a warm-up period, three 4-minute stages of exercise at incremental workload levels, and a cool-down period. The breath-by-breath metabolic data from the portable metabolic unit, heart rate, MET values from the exercise machine, Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion, and watts were recorded continuously throughout the exercise protocol.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The concurrent validity of the MET values from the exercise machine and the portable metabolic unit ranged from very good to excellent on both day 1 and day 2 (<I>r</I>=.85&ndash;.97). The test-retest reliability of subjects' heart rate responses and MET values from the portable metabolic unit was moderate to high across submaximal exercise intensities (intraclass correlation coefficients [2,1]=.85&ndash;.91).</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The exercise machine software-generated MET values were representative of directly measured oxygen consumption values across a range of submaximal intensities during all-extremity semirecumbent exercise in older adults with multisystem impairments.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendelsohn, M. E, Connelly, D. M, Overend, T. J, Petrella, R. J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070161</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validity of Values for Metabolic Equivalents of Task During Submaximal All-Extremity Exercise and Reliability of Exercise Responses in Frail Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>756</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>747</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/757?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Misdiagnosis of Serotonin Syndrome as Fibromyalgia and the Role of Physical Therapists]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/757?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> With increased use of serotonergic medications, a condition triggered by serotonin excess within the brain and spinal cord has emerged and may be gaining prevalence. The purposes of this case report are to describe how to identify serotonin syndrome in a patient who is taking citalopram (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) on the basis of signs and symptoms and to promote the ability of physical therapists to recognize such signs and symptoms.</P>
<P><B>Case Description:</B> The patient was a 42-year-old woman referred for physical therapy with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. The physical therapist recognized that the patient's symptoms did not resemble those of fibromyalgia and recommended referral to a neurologist for further diagnostic testing.</P>
<P><B>Outcomes:</B> The patient was referred to a neurologist, who diagnosed serotonin syndrome related to the use of citalopram. The patient was weaned off citalopram and made a successful recovery, with scores on the Oswestry Disability Index decreasing from 70% to 28% at discharge from the physical therapy treatment and to 0% at the 6-month follow-up. The patient has since returned to her prior activity level, which includes skiing, motorcycle riding, and working at her consulting firm.</P>
<P><B>Discussion:</B> This case report demonstrates how careful evaluation by the physical therapist indicated that signs and symptoms were not consistent with fibromyalgia, and further medical evaluation revealed the actual diagnosis of serotonin syndrome.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alnwick, G. M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20060208</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Misdiagnosis of Serotonin Syndrome as Fibromyalgia and the Role of Physical Therapists]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>765</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>757</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/766?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bone Mineral Density of the Tarsals and Metatarsals With Reloading]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/766?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Bone mineral density (BMD) decreases rapidly with prolonged non&ndash;weight bearing. Maximizing the BMD response to reloading activities after NWB is critical to minimizing fracture risk. Methods for measuring individual tarsal and metatarsal BMD have not been available. This case report describes tarsal and metatarsal BMD with a reloading program, as revealed by quantitative computed tomography (QCT).</P>
<P><B>Case Description:</B> A 24-year-old woman was non&ndash;weight bearing for 6 weeks after right talocrural arthroscopy. Tarsal and metatarsal BMD were measured with QCT 9 weeks (before reloading) and 32 weeks (after reloading) after surgery. A 26-week progressive reloading program was completed. Change scores were calculated for BMD before reloading and BMD after reloading for the total foot (average of all tarsals and metatarsals), tarsals, metatarsals, bones of the medial column (calcaneus, navicular, cuneiforms 1 and 2, and metatarsal 1), and bones of the lateral column (calcaneus, cuboid, cuneiform 3, and metatarsals 2&ndash;5). The percent differences in BMD between the involved side and the uninvolved side were calculated.</P>
<P><B>Outcomes:</B> Before reloading, BMD of the involved total foot was 9% lower than that on the uninvolved side. After reloading, BMD increased 22% and 21% for the total foot, 16% and 14% for the tarsals, 29% and 30% for the metatarsals, 14% and 15% for the medial column bones, and 28% and 26% for the lateral column bones on the involved and uninvolved sides, respectively. After reloading, BMD of the involved total foot remained 8% lower than that on the uninvolved side.</P>
<P><B>Discussion:</B> The increase in BMD with reloading was not uniform across all pedal bones; the metatarsals showed a greater increase than the tarsals, and the lateral column bones showed a greater increase than the medial column bones.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hastings, M. K., Gelber, J., Commean, P. K, Prior, F., Sinacore, D. R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070226</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bone Mineral Density of the Tarsals and Metatarsals With Reloading]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>779</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>766</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/780?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Traumatic Dislocation of the Hip in a High School Football Player]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/780?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background:</B> Although traumatic dislocation of the hip often occurs as a result of automobile accidents, dislocations have been reported to occur during sports activities.</P>
<P><B>Objective:</B> Using the experience in treating a 17-year-old high school football player with a posterior dislocation, complicated by involvement of the sciatic nerve, this case report provides background information on hip dislocations and provides a description of the immediate treatment by the physician, followed by 6 weeks of immobilization, and a detailed account of the 5-month intervention.</P>
<P><B>Case Description:</B> The patient was injured while making a tackle during a high school football game when another player fell on him from behind. The case report describes his plan of care after immediate hip reduction surgery and 6 weeks on crutches. Generally, the program utilized a progression of non&ndash;weight-bearing resistance training and stretching in the initial stages of intervention and progressed to weight-bearing activities (on land and in the pool) as the patient was able to tolerate more stress. In addition, the treatment of the sciatic nerve using electrical stimulation during treadmill walking is described.</P>
<P><B>Outcomes:</B> The patient was seen in an outpatient physical therapy clinic an average of 2 times per week for 5 months. At the end of 5 months, results of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) indicated that recreational and sporting activities were within normal limits, and the patient was able to return to playing on his high school football team the next year.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yates, C., Bandy, W. D, Blasier, R D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070298</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Traumatic Dislocation of the Hip in a High School Football Player]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>788</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>780</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/791?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/791?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harris, S. R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.6.791</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>791</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>791</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/793?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rehabilitation for the Postsurgical Orthopedic Patient, ed 2]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/793?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forman, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.6.793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rehabilitation for the Postsurgical Orthopedic Patient, ed 2]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>794</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>793</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book, Multimedia, and Software Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/794?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geriatric Rehabilitation Manual, ed 2]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/794?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Childers, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.6.794</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geriatric Rehabilitation Manual, ed 2]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>795</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>794</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book, Multimedia, and Software Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/796?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neurological Interventions for Physical Therapy, ed 2]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/796?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verbanets, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.6.796</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neurological Interventions for Physical Therapy, ed 2]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>797</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>796</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book, Multimedia, and Software Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decision Making in Spinal Care]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coglianese, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.6.797</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decision Making in Spinal Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>798</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book, Multimedia, and Software Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Persistence of altered movement patterns..." Farquhar SJ, Reisman DS, Snyder-Mackler L. Phys Ther. 2008;88:567-579.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070045.cx</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Persistence of altered movement patterns..." Farquhar SJ, Reisman DS, Snyder-Mackler L. Phys Ther. 2008;88:567-579.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>797</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Influence of different footwear..." Cheung RTH, Ng GYF. Phys Ther. 2008;88:620-628.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/797-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20060323.cx</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Influence of different footwear..." Cheung RTH, Ng GYF. Phys Ther. 2008;88:620-628.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>797</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/801?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/6/801?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.6.801</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>802</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>801</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Scholarships, Fellowships, and Grants</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/555?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Climbing Out of Our Silos to Improve Practice]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/555?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craik, R. L]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.555</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Climbing Out of Our Silos to Improve Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>558</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>555</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background:</B> In a recent study of 655 physical therapists working with a stroke population, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was identified as the most commonly used assessment tool across the continuum of stroke rehabilitation. Given the widespread popularity of the BBS, it is important to critically appraise the BBS for its use with a stroke population.</P>
<P><B>Objective:</B> The purposes of this study were to conduct a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the BBS specific to stroke and to identify strengths and weaknesses in its usefulness for stroke rehabilitation.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Twenty-one studies examining the psychometric properties of the BBS with a stroke population were retrieved. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach alpha=.92&ndash;.98) as was interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]=.95&ndash;.98), intrarater reliability (ICC=.97), and test-retest reliability (ICC=.98). Sixteen studies focused on validity and generally found excellent correlations with the Barthel Index, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, Functional Reach Test, the balance subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Functional Independence Measure, the Rivermead Mobility Index (except for weight shift and step-up items), and gait speed. Berg Balance Scale scores predicted length of stay, discharge destination, motor ability at 180 days poststroke, and disability level at 90 days, but these scores were not predictive of falls. Eight studies focused on responsiveness; all reported moderate to excellent sensitivity. Three studies found floor or ceiling effects.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The BBS is a psychometrically sound measure of balance impairment for use in poststroke assessment. Given the floor and ceiling effects, clinicians may want to use the BBS in conjunction with other balance measures.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blum, L., Korner-Bitensky, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>566</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Persistence of Altered Movement Patterns During a Sit-to-Stand Task 1 Year Following Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), quadriceps femoris muscle strength (force-generating capacity) and functional test scores improve but continue to be lower than those in people without injury. Analysis of the sit-to-stand (STS) task demonstrated side-to-side differences in subjects with TKA, as well as differences between subjects with TKA and control subjects. It was hypothesized that, when using a self-selected starting position, subjects 1 year following TKA would show improvements in strength and movement patterns but would continue to show asymmetries of angles and moments at the hips and knees.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> Twenty-four subjects (12 subjects with unilateral TKA and 12 control subjects) were recruited; those with TKA were tested 3 months and 1 year following surgery. Motion analysis of an STS task was synchronized with 2 force platforms and electromyography. Outcome measures included joint angles and moments, electromyography, vertical ground reaction forces, muscle strength, and functional performance tests.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Subjects with TKA showed improvements in symmetry of motion, strength, and functional performance from 3 months to 1 year following TKA. Compared with control subjects, subjects with TKA relied on increased hip flexion and a larger hip extensor moment to perform the STS task.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The increased hip extensor moment demonstrated that subjects adopted a strategy to avoid the use of the quadriceps femoris muscle, yet this strategy persisted as quadriceps femoris muscle strength improved. This pattern may be a learned movement pattern that may not resolve without retraining.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farquhar, S. J, Reisman, D. S, Snyder-Mackler, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Persistence of Altered Movement Patterns During a Sit-to-Stand Task 1 Year Following Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>579</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Locomotor Training Restores Walking in a Nonambulatory Child With Chronic, Severe, Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Locomotor training (LT) enhances walking in adult experimental animals and humans with mild-to-moderate spinal cord injuries (SCIs). The animal literature suggests that the effects of LT may be greater on an immature nervous system than on a mature nervous system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of LT in a child with chronic, incomplete SCI.</P>
<P><B>Subject:</B> The subject was a nonambulatory 41/2-year-old boy with an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) C Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) of 4/50 who was deemed permanently wheelchair-dependent and was enrolled in an LT program 16 months after a severe cervical SCI.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> A pretest-posttest design was used in the study. Over 16 weeks, the child received 76 LT sessions using both treadmill and over-ground settings in which graded sensory cues were provided. The outcome measures were ASIA Impairment Scale score, gait speed, walking independence, and number of steps.</P>
<P><B>Result:</B> One month into LT, voluntary stepping began, and the child progressed from having no ability to use his legs to community ambulation with a rolling walker. By the end of LT, his walking independence score had increased from 0 to 13/20, despite no change in LEMS. The child's final self-selected gait speed was 0.29 m/s, with an average of 2,488 community-based steps per day and a maximum speed of 0.48 m/s. He then attended kindergarten using a walker full-time.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> A simple, context-dependent stepping pattern sufficient for community ambulation was recovered in the absence of substantial voluntary isolated lower-extremity movement in a child with chronic, severe SCI. These novel data suggest that some children with severe, incomplete SCI may recover community ambulation after undergoing LT and that the LEMS cannot identify this subpopulation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Behrman, A. L, Nair, P. M, Bowden, M. G, Dauser, R. C, Herget, B. R, Martin, J. B, Phadke, C. P, Reier, P. J, Senesac, C. R, Thompson, F. J, Howland, D. R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070315</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Locomotor Training Restores Walking in a Nonambulatory Child With Chronic, Severe, Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgerton, V R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070315.ic1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>591</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/592?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/592?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McEwen, I. R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070315.ic2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>594</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>592</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/594?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/594?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Behrman, A. L, Nair, P. M, Bowden, M. G, Dauser, R. C, Herget, B. R, Martin, J. B, Phadke, C. P, Reier, P. J, Senesac, C. R, Thompson, F. J, Howland, D. R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070315.ar</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>595</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>594</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/596?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reference Curves for the Gross Motor Function Measure: Percentiles for Clinical Description and Tracking Over Time Among Children With Cerebral Palsy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/596?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Physical therapists frequently use the 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) to examine gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Until now, reference percentiles for this measure were not available. The aim of this study was to improve the clinical utility of this gross motor measure by developing cross-sectional reference percentiles for the GMFM-66 within levels of the GMFCS.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> A total of 1,940 motor measurements from 650 children with CP were used to develop percentiles. These observations were taken from a subsample, stratified by age and GMFCS, of those in a longitudinal cohort study reported in 2002. A standard LMS (skewness-median-coefficient of variation) method was used to develop cross-sectional reference percentiles.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Reference curves were created for the GMFM-66 by age and GMFCS level, plotted at the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percentiles. The variability of change in children's percentiles over a 1-year interval also was investigated.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion.</B> The reference percentiles extend the clinical utility of the GMFM-66 and GMFCS by providing for appropriate normative interpretation of GMFM-66 scores within GMFCS levels. When interpreting change in percentiles over time, therapists must carefully consider the large variability in change that is typical among children with CP. The use of percentiles should be supplemented by interpretation of the raw scores to understand change in function as well as relative standing.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanna, S. E, Bartlett, D. J, Rivard, L. M, Russell, D. J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070314</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reference Curves for the Gross Motor Function Measure: Percentiles for Clinical Description and Tracking Over Time Among Children With Cerebral Palsy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>607</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/608?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Physical Therapists: A Prospective Cohort Study With 1-Year Follow-up]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/608?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background:</B> Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) have a significant impact on physical therapists, but few studies have addressed the issue. Research is needed to determine the scope of the problem and the effects of specific risk factors.</P>
<P><B>Objectives:</B> The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the 1-year incidence rate of WMSDs in physical therapists and (2) to determine the effects of specific risk factors.</P>
<P><B>Design:</B> This was a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> Subjects were randomly selected American Physical Therapy Association members (N=882). Exposure assessment included demographic data, physical risk factors, job strain, and specific physical therapy tasks. The primary outcome was WMSDs, with a severity rating of at least 4/10 and present at least once a month or lasting longer than a week.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The response rate to the baseline questionnaire was 67%. Ninety-three percent of the subjects who responded to the baseline questionnaire responded to the follow-up questionnaire. The 1-year incidence rate of WMSDs was 20.7%. Factors that increased the risk for WMSDs included patient transfers, patient repositioning, bent or twisted postures, joint mobilization, soft tissue work, and job strain.</P>
<P><B>Limitations:</B> The primary limitation of this study was the number of therapists who had a change in their job situation during the follow-up year.</P>
<P><B>Conclusions:</B> Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent in physical therapists. Physical therapy exposures, patient handling, and manual therapy, in particular, increase the risk for WMSDs.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campo, M., Weiser, S., Koenig, K. L, Nordin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Physical Therapists: A Prospective Cohort Study With 1-Year Follow-up]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>619</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>608</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/620?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of Different Footwear on Force of Landing During Running]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/620?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in foot pronation with mileage in runners. Motion control footwear was designed to check excessive foot motions, but its clinical efficacy, especially in terms of pedographic analysis, has not been well reported. The purposes of this study were to investigate the changes in plantar force in people when running with motion control shoes and to compare pedographic measurements obtained in 2 footwear testing conditions (wearing motion control shoes and wearing neutral shoes) at the beginning and end of a 1.5-km running session.</P>
<P><B>Subjects:</B> Twenty-five recreational runners who had &ge;6 degrees of foot pronation participated in the study.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> An insole sensor was used to register the plantar force of the subjects before and after running 1.5 km in different shoe conditions.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> There was no change in the magnitude and distribution pattern of plantar force with the motion control shoes after the 1.5-km run. With the neutral shoes, however, there was an increase in mean peak force under the medial midfoot (364&ndash;418 N, 15% increase) and first metatarsal head (524&ndash;565 N, 8% increase) toward the end of the running bout.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The plantar force on the medial foot structures increased with mileage of running with neutral shoes but not with motion control shoes. This finding has implications for injury prevention with footwear selection for recreational runners who have more than 6 degrees of foot pronation.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheung, R. T., Ng, G. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20060323</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of Different Footwear on Force of Landing During Running]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>628</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>620</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/629?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pediatric Physical Therapists' Perceptions of Their Training in Assistive Technology]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/629?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Availability of assistive technology (AT) and federal legislation promoting greater use of AT for children with disabilities have increased substantially. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceived adequacy of previous training in AT, specific training needs, preferred methods of training, and the confidence level of pediatric physical therapists in providing AT.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> Three hundred eighty pediatric physical therapists responded to a survey questionnaire mailed to a random sample of members of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association. The survey was used to determine training needs of therapists in the area of AT, their confidence in delivering AT services, preferred methods of training, and challenges in becoming trained.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The therapists reported having less-than-adequate training in AT and a lack of confidence in delivering AT services. They also reported that they would like accessible and affordable training that focuses on funding technology and services, knowledge of specific devices, and assessment and evaluation methods.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The findings underscore the need to develop pre-service, in-service, and continuing education training opportunities in AT for providers working with children who have disabilities.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Long, T. M, Perry, D. F]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20060356</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pediatric Physical Therapists' Perceptions of Their Training in Assistive Technology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>639</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>629</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/640?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Gait During Performance of the Dynamic Gait Index in People With and People Without Balance or Vestibular Disorders]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/640?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Understanding underlying gait characteristics during performance of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) could potentially guide interventions. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and reliability of gait performance during the level walking items of the DGI in people with balance or vestibular dysfunction. The study was a cross-sectional investigation with 2-group comparisons.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> Forty-seven subjects (mean age=59.2 years, SD=8.5, range=24&ndash;90) participated in the study; 26 were control subjects, and 21 were subjects with balance or vestibular dysfunction. Three trials of each level gait item were administered to subjects as they ambulated on an instrumented walkway. Test-retest reliability was determined by use of an intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1) 2-way random-effects model for gait parameters associated with continuous walking and the item requiring turning and stopping quickly. Mean gait parameter differences between control subjects and subjects with balance or vestibular disorders were compared by use of a multivariate analysis of variance for each gait task.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The reliability of most gait parameters during DGI performance were fair to excellent between trials. Subjects with balance or vestibular disorders demonstrated differences in gait characteristics compared with control subjects. The heterogeneity of the group of subjects with balance or vestibular disorders does not permit inferences to be drawn regarding the relationship between gait and any specific balance or vestibular diagnosis. The results are most pertinent to people with chronic balance or vestibular disorders.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Gait parameters underlying dynamic walking appeared to be relatively reliable across multiple trials and distinguished subjects with balance or vestibular disorders. Evaluating a person's performance on items of the DGI may be useful in identifying gait deviations and in evaluating gait improvements as a result of interventions.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marchetti, G. F, Whitney, S. L, Blatt, P. J, Morris, L. O, Vance, J. M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070130</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Gait During Performance of the Dynamic Gait Index in People With and People Without Balance or Vestibular Disorders]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>651</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>640</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/652?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/652?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching has emerged as an evaluative measure of upper-extremity motor performance in people after stroke. However, the psychometric properties supporting the use of kinematic data for evaluating longitudinal change in motor performance have not been established. The objective of this study was to determine, in a test-retest reliability manner, the reproducibility and minimal detectable change for reaching kinematics in people after stroke.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> Fourteen participants with hemiparesis after stroke performed forward reaching tasks on 2 occasions 37.3 (SD=9.8) days apart. At each session, participants performed 4 forward reaching tasks produced by the combination of 2 target heights (low and high [109 and 153 cm from the floor, respectively]) and 2 instructed movement speeds (self-selected and as fast as possible). Two analytical methods were used to calculate kinematic parameters.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) ranged from .04 to .99, and absolute reliability (standard error of measurement) ranged from 2.7% to 76.8%, depending on the kinematic variable, the demands of the motor task (target height and movement speed), and the analytical method. Bland-Altman analysis, a statistical method used to assess the repeatability of a method, revealed few systematic errors between sessions. The minimal detectable change ranged from 7.4% to 98.9%.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Depending on the demands of the motor task and the analytical method, most kinematic outcome measures (such as peak hand velocity, endpoint error, reach extent, maximum shoulder flexion range of motion, and minimum elbow extension range of motion) are reliable measures of motor performance in people after stroke. However, because of the magnitude of within-subject measurement error, some variables (such as peak hand velocity, time to peak hand velocity, and movement time) must change considerably (&gt;50%) to indicate a real change in individual participants. The results of our reliability analysis, which are based on our cohort of participants with hemiparesis after stroke and our specific paradigm, may not be generalizable to different subpopulations of people with hemiparesis after stroke or to the myriad movement tasks and kinematic variables used for the assessment of reaching performance in people after stroke.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wagner, J. M, Rhodes, J. A, Patten, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070255</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>663</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>652</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/664?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Keitel Functional Test for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Translation, Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/664?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The purpose of this study was to translate the German Keitel Functional Test (KFT) into Danish and test it for reliability, concurrent and predictive validity, and responsiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> Translation of the KFT was performed according to international recommendations, and the translated version was tested twice by 2 observers for intraobserver and interobserver reliability, with a 1-week interval between assessments, in 20 patients with RA with stable disease activity. Validity was investigated by studying 2 patient groups: (1) 15 patients with long-lasting (median=6 years) active RA, tested before and after 2, 6, and 14 weeks of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-) inhibitor therapy, and (2) 35 patients with early (median=0.25 year) RA, tested at years 0, 0.5, 1, and 2. Twenty-three patients in the early RA group also were tested at year 7. KFT, conventional clinical and biochemical markers of disease activity, and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were used.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The translated KFT showed good intraobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]=.90 and .95, coefficient of variation [CV]=3.5%) and interobserver reliability (ICC=.99 and .92, CV=3.5%), and the KFT correlated with several measures of disease activity and, most closely, with the HAQ. The KFT was, in contrast to clinical disease activity measures, not sensitive to changes over time. Only baseline KFT data were significantly related to functional changes over a long period of time as measured by the KFT, and only in the early RA group.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The Danish translation of the KFT showed good reliability, acceptable concurrent validity, very poor responsiveness, and inconclusive results concerning predictive validity. The results of this study do not support the use of the KFT for monitoring function in clinical practice, as an outcome measure in clinical trials, or as a predictor of functional changes.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holm, B., Jacobsen, S., Skjodt, H., Klarlund, M., Jensen, T., Hetland, M. L., Ostergaard, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Keitel Functional Test for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Translation, Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>678</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>664</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/679?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Diagnosis of fall risk in Parkinson disease..." Dibble et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:323-332.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/679?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norton, B. J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.679.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Diagnosis of fall risk in Parkinson disease..." Dibble et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:323-332.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>679</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>679</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/679-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/679-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dibble, L. E, Foreman, K B., Ballard, D J., Christensen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.679.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>680</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>679</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/680?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Modified constraint-induced therapy..." Page et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/680?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolf, S. L]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.680</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Modified constraint-induced therapy..." Page et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>684</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>680</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/684?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/684?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Page, S., Levine, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>688</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>684</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/688?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Still 'Not Satisfied'...Yet." Craik RL, Maher C. Phys Ther. 2008;88:423-425.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/688?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.423.cx</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Still 'Not Satisfied'...Yet." Craik RL, Maher C. Phys Ther. 2008;88:423-425.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>688</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>688</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/688-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited commentary on "Use of the Berg Balance Scale..." Studenski SA. Phys Ther. 2008;88:460-461.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/688-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.688</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited commentary on "Use of the Berg Balance Scale..." Studenski SA. Phys Ther. 2008;88:460-461.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>688</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>688</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/689?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/5/689?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.689</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>690</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>689</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Scholarships, Fellowships, and Grants</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Still "Not Satisfied" ... Yet]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craik, R. L, Maher, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.423</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Still "Not Satisfied" ... Yet]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>425</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigation of Clinical Effects of High- and Low-Resistance Training for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Muscle strength training is important for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). High-resistance exercise has been demonstrated to be more beneficial than low-resistance exercise for young subjects. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of high- and low-resistance strength training in elderly subjects with knee OA.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> One hundred two subjects were randomly assigned to groups that received 8 weeks of high-resistance exercise (HR group), 8 weeks of low-resistance exercise (LR group), or no exercise (control group). Pain, function, walking time, and muscle torque were examined before and after intervention.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Significant improvement for all measures was observed in both exercise groups. There was no significant difference in any measures between HR and LR groups. However, based on effect size between exercise and control groups, the HR group improved more than the LR group.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Both high- and low-resistance strength training significantly improved clinical effects in this study. The effects of high-resistance strength training appear to be larger than those of low-resistance strength training for people with mild to moderate knee OA, although the differences between the HR and LR groups were not statistically significant.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan, M.-H., Lin, J.-J., Liau, J.-J., Lin, Y.-F., Lin, D.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20060300</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigation of Clinical Effects of High- and Low-Resistance Training for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>436</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/437?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Therapeutic Effect of an Implantable Peroneal Nerve Stimulator in Subjects With Chronic Stroke and Footdrop: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/437?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> <I>Footdrop</I>, characterized by a person's inability to raise the foot at the ankle, is a common problem in patients with stroke. A randomized controlled trial was performed to determine the therapeutic effect of using a new implantable, 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator for 6 months versus an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO).</P>
<P><B>Subjects:</B> Twenty-nine patients with chronic stroke and footdrop participated in the study. The mean time from stroke was 7.3 years (SD=7.3), and all subjects were community ambulators.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> The study used a randomized controlled trial design. The functional electrical stimulation (FES) group received the implantable stimulation system for correction of their footdrop. The control group continued using their conventional walking device (ie, AFO, orthopedic shoes, or no walking device). All subjects were measured at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 26 in the gait laboratory. The therapeutic effect of FES on the maximum value of the root mean square (RMSmax) of the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle with both flexed and extended knees and walking speed were selected as the primary outcome measures. The RMSmax of the peroneus longus (PL), gastrocnemius (GS), and soleus (SL) muscles with both flexed and extended knees and muscle activity of the TA muscle of the affected leg during the swing phase of gait were selected as secondary outcome measures.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> A significantly higher RMSmax of the TA muscle with extended knee was found after using FES. No change in walking speed was found when the stimulator was not switched on. A significantly increased RMSmax of the GS muscle with both flexed and extended knees was found after using FES.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Functionally, no therapeutic effect of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation was found. However, the significantly increased voluntary muscle output of the TA and GS muscles after the use of FES suggests that there was a certain extent of plasticity in the subjects in this study.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kottink, A. I., Hermens, H. J, Nene, A. V, Tenniglo, M. J, Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G, IJzerman, M. J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Therapeutic Effect of an Implantable Peroneal Nerve Stimulator in Subjects With Chronic Stroke and Footdrop: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>448</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>437</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/449?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of the Berg Balance Scale for Predicting Multiple Falls in Community-Dwelling Elderly People: A Prospective Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/449?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Falls are a significant public health concern for older adults; early identification of people at high risk for falling facilitates the provision of rehabilitation treatment to reduce future fall risk. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to examine the predictive validity of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for 3 types of outcomes&mdash;any fall (&ge;1 fall), multiple falls (&ge;2 falls), and injurious falls&mdash;by use of sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve, and likelihood ratios.</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> A sample of 210 community-dwelling older adults received a comprehensive geriatric assessment at baseline, which included the BBS to measure balance. Data on prospective falls were collected monthly for a year. The predictive validity of the BBS for the identification of future fall risk was evaluated.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The BBS had good discriminative ability to predict multiple falls when ROC analysis was used. However, the use of the BBS as a dichotomous scale, with a threshold of &le;45, was inadequate for the identification of the majority of people at risk for falling in the future, with sensitivities of 25% and 45% for any fall and for multiple falls, respectively. The use of likelihood ratios, maintaining the BBS as a multilevel scale, demonstrated a gradient of risk across scores, with fall risk increasing as scores decreased.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The use of the BBS as a dichotomous scale to identify people at high risk for falling should be discouraged because it fails to identify the majority of such people. The predictive validity of this scale for multiple falls is superior to that for other types of falls, and the use of likelihood ratios preserves the gradient of risk across the whole range of scores.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muir, S. W, Berg, K., Chesworth, B., Speechley, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070251</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of the Berg Balance Scale for Predicting Multiple Falls in Community-Dwelling Elderly People: A Prospective Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>459</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>449</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/460?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/460?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Studenski, S. A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070251.ic</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>461</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>460</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/462?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Exercise on Lower-Extremity Muscle Strength and Power in an Older Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/462?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Vibration training is a relatively new exercise intervention. This study investigated the effects of vibration exercise on strength (force-producing capacity) and power in older adults who are healthy.</P>
<P><B>Participants and Methods:</B> Thirty participants (mean age=73.7 years, SD=4.6) were randomly assigned to a vibration exercise training (VIB) group or an exercise without vibration training (EX) group. The interventions consisted of 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included isokinetic flexor and extensor strength and power of the hip, knee, and ankle.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The VIB group significantly improved ankle plantar flexor strength and power compared with the EX group. However, there were no significant differences between the VIB and EX groups for knee flexor or extensor strength.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Vibration training contributed to an increase in plantar flexor strength and power. However, the strength gains for the knee and hip flexors and extensors for the VIB group and the EX group were comparable. Future vibration protocols should explore different body positions to target muscles higher up on the leg.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rees, S. S, Murphy, A. J, Watsford, M. L]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Exercise on Lower-Extremity Muscle Strength and Power in an Older Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>470</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>462</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/471?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inflammatory Myelopathies and Traumatic Spinal Cord Lesions: Comparison of Functional and Neurological Outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/471?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Outcomes knowledge is essential to answer patients' questions regarding function, to plan the use of resources, and to evaluate treatments to enhance recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) with those of patients with inflammatory spinal cord lesions (ISCLs).</P>
<P><B>Subjects and Methods:</B> The authors evaluated 181 subjects with traumatic SCI and 67 subjects with ISCLs. Using a matching cohorts procedure, 38 subjects were selected from each group. The measures used were the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (motor function), the Barthel Index (BI), the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI).</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The subjects in the ISCL group were older than those in the SCI group, with a longer interval from onset of lesion to rehabilitation admission and more incomplete lesions. In the matching cohorts, at admission, the traumatic SCI group had RMI and WISCI scores comparable to those of the ISCL group, but the traumatic SCI group had lower scores on the BI (greater dependence on assistance for activities of daily living). At discharge, the 2 groups had comparable functional outcomes. The neurological status of the 2 groups was comparable at admission and discharge.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The results indicate that, at admission, patients with SCI have a greater physical dependence for assistance with activities of daily living than patients with ISCLs who have comparable neurological status. Such a difference depends on factors not related to the spinal cord lesion, such as the presence of associated lesions, the need to wear an orthotic device, or the sequelae of surgery. The outcomes of patients with SCI are determined more by factors such as lesion level and severity and age than by etiology. This finding could have implications for health care planning and rehabilitation research.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scivoletto, G., Cosentino, E., Mammone, A., Molinari, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inflammatory Myelopathies and Traumatic Spinal Cord Lesions: Comparison of Functional and Neurological Outcomes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>484</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>471</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of a Single Session of Posterior-to-Anterior Spinal Mobilization and Press-up Exercise on Pain Response and Lumbar Spine Extension in People With Nonspecific Low Back Pain]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Posterior-to-anterior (PA) mobilization and press-up exercises are common physical therapy interventions used to treat low back pain. The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate effects of PA mobilization and a press-up exercise on pain with standing extension and lumbar extension in people with nonspecific low back pain.</P>
<P><B>Subjects:</B> The study participants were 30 adults (19 women and 11 men) who were 18 to 45 years of age and had a diagnosis of nonspecific low back pain.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> Lumbar segmental extension during a press-up maneuver was measured by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging prior to and immediately following a single session of either PA spinal mobilization or a press-up exercise. Pain scores before and after intervention were recorded with a visual analog scale. Differences between the treatment groups in pain and total lumbar extension were compared over time by use of a 2-way analysis of variance.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Following both interventions, there was a significant reduction in the average pain scores for both groups (significant main effect for time, no interaction). Similarly, total lumbar extension significantly increased in both the PA mobilization group and the press-up group (significant main effect for time, no interaction). No significant differences between the 2 interventions in pain or lumbar extension were found.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> The findings of this study support the use of PA mobilization and a press-up exercise for improving lumbar extension in people with nonspecific low back pain. Although statistically significant within-group changes in pain were detected, the clinical meaningfulness of these changes is questionable.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Powers, C. M, Beneck, G. J, Kulig, K., Landel, R. F, Fredericson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of a Single Session of Posterior-to-Anterior Spinal Mobilization and Press-up Exercise on Pain Response and Lumbar Spine Extension in People With Nonspecific Low Back Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>493</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/494?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Pilates Exercises on Shoulder Range of Motion, Pain, Mood, and Upper-Extremity Function in Women Living With Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/494?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of Pilates exercises on shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain, mood, and upper-extremity (UE) function in women who had been treated for breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Participants:</B> The participants were 4 women who had undergone axillary dissection and radiation therapy for stage I to IV breast cancer.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> A nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline, single-subject research design was used to examine the effects of Pilates exercises on the 4 outcomes.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Visual analyses of the data suggest a modest effect of the Pilates exercise program in improving shoulder abduction and external rotation ROM. Statistically significant improvement in shoulder internal and external rotation in the affected UE was shown for the one participant with pre-existing metastatic disease. The improving baselines seen for pain, mood, and UE function data made it impossible to assess the effects of Pilates exercises on those outcomes. No adverse events were experienced.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Pilates exercises may be an effective and safe exercise option for women who are recovering from breast cancer treatments; however, further research is needed.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keays, K. S, Harris, S. R, Lucyshyn, J. M, MacIntyre, D. L]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070099</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Pilates Exercises on Shoulder Range of Motion, Pain, Mood, and Upper-Extremity Function in Women Living With Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>510</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>494</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Running Training After Stroke: A Single-Subject Report]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> Although many people who have had a stroke are primarily interested in learning to walk, some are able to focus on a return to recreational and sporting activities. This study was carried out to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of intensive task-oriented training in the body-weight&ndash;support/treadmill environment to improve running for a subject after stroke.</P>
<P><B>Subject:</B> The subject was a 38-year-old man who had a stroke 2.5 years previously.</P>
<P><B>Methods:</B> A single-subject design with baseline, intervention, immediate postintervention, and 6-month postintervention phases was conducted. Dependent variables included 25-m sprint time, single-leg balance, running step width, running step length ratio, Stroke Impact Scale, 6-minute walk test, and lower-extremity strength (force-generating capacity).</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> At the 6-month postintervention phase, sprint speed, left single-leg balance, and step width changed significantly from the baseline phase. Step length ratio trended toward less symmetry but more consistency, and muscle strength improved more than 20% in 6 of 8 muscle groups in the involved lower extremity and 4 of 8 muscle groups in the uninvolved lower extremity.</P>
<P><B>Discussion and Conclusion:</B> Intensive task-specific training was feasible and effective for retraining running ability in the study subject. He returned to recreational running, which provided him with a greatly improved outlook and a better quality of life.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, E. W, Combs, S. A, Fish, C., Bense, B., Owens, A., Burch, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20050240</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Running Training After Stroke: A Single-Subject Report]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>522</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/523?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Group-based Aerobic Interval Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Norwegian Ullevaal Model]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/523?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Background and Purpose:</B> The purpose of this case report is to describe the responses of 4 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) to a novel rehabilitation program: a group-based, high-intensity, interval-training program that includes aerobic, resistance, flexibility, and balance activities.</P>
<P><B>Case Descriptions:</B> Four patients (55&ndash;71 years of age) with CHF (New York Heart Association class III) participated in the rehabilitation program twice per week for 16 weeks. Outcome measures included a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), a cycle ergometer test (aerobic capacity), and a quality-of-life questionnaire.</P>
<P><B>Outcomes:</B> Patients 1, 2, and 3 increased their aerobic capacity (17%, 25%, and 52%, respectively). Patient 4 did not complete the cycle ergometer test because of limitations associated with his pacemaker. All patients increased their 6MWT distance (117, 66, 135, and 143 m for patients 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). No adverse events were reported.</P>
<P><B>Discussion:</B> The Norwegian Ullevaal Model of cardiac rehabilitation is a novel high-intensity, interval-training program. The 4 patients with CHF in this case series who participated in this program experienced improvements in physical capacity and quality of life and had no adverse events. These results are consistent with recent evidence supporting the efficacy of high-intensity interval training in people with CHF. Randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this group-based, high-intensity, aerobic interval-training program for patients with CHF.</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilsson, B. B., Hellesnes, B., Westheim, A., Risberg, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20060374</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Group-based Aerobic Interval Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Norwegian Ullevaal Model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>535</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>523</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/536?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments..." Landel et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:43-49.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/536?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbott, J H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.536.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments..." Landel et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:43-49.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>536</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>536</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/536-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/536-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landel, R., Kulig, K., Fredericson, M., Li, B., Powers, C. M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.536.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>537</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>536</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/538?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/538?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warden, S. J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.538</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>539</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>538</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/539?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/539?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maher, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.539.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>539</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>539</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/539-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/539-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennett, S. E, Ohtake, P. J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.539.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>540</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>539</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richter, R. R, Schlomer, S. L, Krieger, M. M, Siler, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.540</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>541</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/543?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/content/short/88/4/543?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2008.88.4.543</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News from th